Over the past twenty years there has
been a dramatic change in the Chinese government=s attitude toward Confucius. From being regarded as a
anti-progress millstone he is being hailed as a possible model to renew and
unite Chinese society and individuals. Hugh MacMahon traces how and why this
transformation has come about.
A Confucian Reversal
The re-emergence of Confucius as a
national icon is a good illustration of how much China has changed, and not
changed, in the past forty years.
In November 1966, encouraged by Mao=s instructions to smash everything
connected with traditional life, two hundred teachers and students came from
Beijing to >de-culturalize= the Confucian Temple in the sage=s home town of Qufu.
They destroyed 6618 cultural objects including 929
paintings, 2700 manuscripts and 2000
graves of Confucius=
descendants. The intensity of the anti-Confucius movement was to be renewed
when Mao claimed that the assassination plot of his proposed successor, Lin
Biao, was intellectually inspired by Confucianism. In retaliation he launched a
new >Anti-Lin
and Anti-Confucius=
campaign.
However, with the liberalization of
the county after the fall of Mao, a need to reinstate Confucius was
gradually recognized. In 1989, just
weeks after the crackdown on democracy in Tiananmen Square, Deng Xiaoping proclaimed
the need to rid the country of Western influence and ordered a celebration of
Confucius=
birthday. Jiang Zemin, the new leader, made an unannounced appearance signaling
the Party=s
approval.
Recently, in September 2005, the
government hosted another birthday celebration for Confucius, the most lavish
since its take-over in 1949. In February of that year President Hu Jintao had
quoted Confucius as saying, AHarmony
is something to be cherish@
and launched a buzzword that still resonates whenever Party members give a
speech on creating a >harmonious
society=.
At the Confucian celebration in
2005 over a hundred scholars gathered to discuss how the teachings of the Sage
could serve as the >moral
foundation= for the
country today. Confucius was no longer an object of ridicule.
The Confucian Institutes
Since 2004 China=s Foreign and Education ministries have
being quietly establishing a worldwide network of Chinese cultural centers
called >Confucian
Institutes=. They
are modeled on the Goethe Institutes of China, the British Council of the
United Kingdom and Alliance Francaise. The program will cost $10 billion and
lead to a chain of one hundred institutes worldwide by 2010.
The charter for the institutes
explains, AConfucius
is a famous thinker, educator and philosopher in China. His doctrine has a very
important influence throughout the world. To name this institute after him
shows the longevity of the Chinese language and culture. It also embodies the
development trend of the integration of Chinese language and culture in the new
century.@
A Convergence of Interests
The re-emergence of Confucius over
the past twenty-five years has roots in a number of vested interests at various
levels of Chinese government and
society. They can be summarized under the headings of the search for a new
national identity, the development of cultural industries and the need for a
moral basis to promote national harmony and prosperity.
National Image
Today China is seen as an economic,
if not military, threat by the United States. Many Americans still regard China
with suspicion and fear. In Asia, China=s
neighbors are aware of the growing power of the >Middle
Kingdom= and want
to enjoy the benefits of economic relations with it while avoiding coming under
its political and cultural control.
In the face of this ambiguity,
China can amicably promote the image of
the Sage of Qufu as Aa
softer Confucian face rather than the hard-line communist face.@ It is thoroughly Chinese but is also
recognized as peaceful, non-threatening and non-radical. It promotes good
relationship between individual and teaches
datong, the concept that all the world=s
peoples should behave like one big family.
While the worldwide network of >Confucian Institutes= will concentrate on teaching the
Chinese language, they will also introduce the country=s
tourist spots and culture. With Beijing due to host the 2008 Olympic Games, the
next few years are seen as an opportunity to show that the county is more than
just the world=s largest
workshop.
Cultural Industry
Authorities in Shandong, Confucius= home province, are drawing up plans to
increase the number of tourists. AShandong
has the advantage of assets such as Confucius and Mount Tai to help develop a
strong culture-based economy. The opportunity lies in marketing those cultural
resources.@
Officials in Beijing see even wider
possibilities for Confucius. Aware that they have produced no popular literature
on the level of >Harry
Potter= or >The Da Vinci Code=, they believe they have a cultural
deficit to catch up on.
The People=s Daily lamented, AWhile China continues to welcome
foreign cultural products, a >China
wind= has
still not stirred up much dust.@
The >Confucian
Institutes= are
expected to play a rule: the ministry of education says some 40 million people
are learning Chinese at present but expect the figure to hit one hundred
million by 2010. At present some 36,000 foreigners are studying Mandarin in
China. This is expected to be an ever-growing source of income also.
Business people are looking for
success in the book market also. They want to establish China on the literary
map and have foreign publishers queuing up to bid for translation rights.
Penguin Books set a Chinese record when they paid US$100,000 for the worldwide
English rights of Jiang Rong=s
The Wolf Totem.
Similarly, China would like to
rival Korea and Japan in the area of pop songs, films, movies and art.
At present China=s cultural industry is worth about US$
42 billion but that is only a small percentage of the world market. There are
now some 10 million people working in the domestic cultural industries and this
figure will continue to grow .
While Confucius-related products
will only play a small part in this >culture
industrial revolution=
the leaders who are directing the expansion are well aware of the Sage=s symbolic value and support the
revival of Confucian exposure to the national and world consciousness.
A Moral Force
AMoney
worship is eroding the body of society and morality has lost its sacred
meaning,@ lamented
the People=s
Daily earlier this year. Marxism no
longer has any credibility and with the nation engrossed in consumer
materialism a moral and philosophical
vacuum has been created.
The Confucian scholar, Professor
William de Bary, was a speaker at a 2545th birthday celebration for
Confucius in Beijing, October 2005. In a recent reflection on the event he remarked,
AChina is confronting the specter of an
unrestrained individualism and the worry is articulated in the form of an
attack on Western individualism. The complaint about Western individualism
actually reflects a concern about a Chinese individualism that is running
rampant. It=s the
consequence of the failure of Marxism or Maoist morality. Their idea is to try
to shore up public morality somehow by going back to Confucianism.@
Kang Xiaoguang, the country=s top proponent of Confucian education,
thinks Confucian values are the answer to China=s
needs. AChinese
society today is at its worst ever. The problem is that there are no moral
standards to regulate how people treat each other, their business partners,
their friends or families. Relationships are ambiguous and we have no way of
judging what makes a happy life.@
Kang wants Confucian education to
become mandatory for all school children. More than 5 million primary school
student now study Confucius in the classroom and 18 major universities hold
courses in Confucian philosophy or host Confucian research institutes. However
the government is reluctant to put its full weight behind the Confucian way as
that might be seen as official recognition that Marxism has failed.
A United Counttry
With the weakening of Marxist
ideology, China has lost its strongest unifying force. The only remaining >national glue=
is nationalism and the leaders in Beijing use it with moderation lest it get
out of control.
Confucianism it a tempting
alternative. Traditionally it prizes social harmony, calls for obedience to the
emperor and other authority figures and expects that the emperor, in turn, will
wield the so-called mandate of heaven in a moral way.
AThe
government has found that a Leninist method of government is too rigid, while
democratic government has an anarchic quality that is too destabilizing,@ say Richard Baum, director of the UCLA
center for Chinese studies. AThe
Confucian ideal of a >mandate
of heaven=, where
the emperor rules with a virtually absolute mandate, provided he takes care of
the people, is very close to the modern-day notion of benevolent despotism.@
However even some Chinese critics
see this as unrealistic.
Hu Xingdou, a lecturer at Beijing
Institute of Technology, says, AYou
cannot completely copy a traditional
belief system in the modern era. Confucius places a priority on how people
should behave, asking them to suppress desires and adhere to a high level of
moral etiquette. This is unrealistic.@
Professor Baum agrees. He believe
the Confucian craze Ais
a weak substitute for real institutional reform .... Mao always used to stress
that the people could change their consciousness through self-criticism and now
the authorities are doing it again by saying the solution to corruption is to educate moral
people. It is a coat of paint.A
A Viable Solution?
Kang Xiaoguang says the debate is
not whether to resurrect Confucius but on which pedestal to enshrine him B as part of the education system, as political ideology or as a national
religion. He says, AI don=t expect other countries to accept
Confucius but if China and the world uses Confucian theory as a basis for
international relations it would benefit everyone as moral rightness would
overcome self-interest.@
No comments:
Post a Comment