The Book, The Movie,
The Institutes, the Challenge
Should you read >Confucius
from the Heart=, by the
Chinese broadcaster Yu Dan? It has been read by over ten million Chinese
looking for some balance and direction in their new consumerist world and by thousands of curious non-Chinese
wondering what elements from the past continue to influence Chinese. It also
had the strong backing of the Chinese government who hoped it would help
stabilize society.
Don=t
be put off by the foreign reviewers and local critics who have panned it as
light-weight >Chicken
Soup for the (Confucian) Soul=.
It is an attempt to re-write Confucianism in an easily digestible way for
people today. In doing so it may have omitted some of the key elements of
Confucian thought but in does give insights into the Confucian ideal of how an
individual should think and act.
According to the author, we need to
return to what is basic and constant for guidance in a world where beliefs and
values seem to always changing. Confucius accepted that it was to be found in
Heaven which guides mankind and the universe from within. AThe Heavens never speak a word, yet the
four seasons come round again and again, and all of nature increases and
multiplies around us. Do the heavens need to speak as well?@ What we are looking for is not in
books but in our hearts where Heaven has planted it.
The book is divided into six
chapters: The Way of Heaven and Earth, The Way of Heart and Soul, The Way of
the World, The Way of Friendship, The Way of Ambition and The Way of Being.
They all focus on the ideal person (junzi) who is known for their
patience, integrity and consideration of others. Junzi quickly recognize
their own shortcomings and are always ready to learn from others. They do not
do to anyone what they would not want done to themselves. They choose their
friends carefully as they know the influence that good and bad friends can
have. They have no ambition except to develop their personality. They are
cautious and deliberate. They would never rush across a pedestrian crossing
before the light turned green.
This could give the impression that
the Confucian >cultivated
person= is dull,
fatalistic and unconcerned about social issues. However, what distinguished Confucians from
their contemporary Taoists was their conviction that a person=s character could be developed only by
participating actively in the affairs of their family, community and country.
In practice, the first qualification for an official in China
was to be an example of Confucian thought and behavior.
Yu Dan=s
>Confucius of the Heart=, however, is careful not to wander
into the fields of politics or government. The author does not go any further
than examining personal attitudes and the role of benevolence. That is all her government supporters would want.
She barely mentions to the
distinctive Confucian virtues of Duty and Ritual.
>Duty=
meant personal responsibilities within the Five Relationships: ruler and ruled,
parents and children, husband and wife, between siblings and between friends. The responsibility
worked both ways: for example, the ruler had responsibilities toward the ruled
and the ruled towards the ruler. Later, when >duty= evolved along patriarchal and
feudalistic lines it gave Confucianism a bad name, and are the reason why the
majority of younger Chinese have a negative impression of Confucius.
Yu Dan prudently avoids the
unpopular concept of >dutiful= but by doing so she presents an
unbalanced view of Confucianism. If the duties of the Five Relationships are
carried out in a spirit of mutual respect, as Confucius intended them to be,
they can be a very practical and positive way of practicing benevolence.
However, getting a modern audience to appreciate this attitude would not be an
easy task.
Similarly, in an age when
informality has become a virtue, the idea that ritual is a powerful tool in
forming attitudes might not be popular. Confucian >ritual= included not only the rites in temples to Heaven,
local gods or ancestors but the formal words and gestures made on a daily basis
in living out the Five Relationships. Some of this etiquette is authentically
portrayed in the movie 2010 blockbuster movie, >Confucius= (cf below). While the movie is open to
criticism on a number of levels, at least it was made in China
by Chinese to whom the traditional rituals are still familiar.
Confucius saw the value of
ceremony, both on public and family occasions, as a way of instilling in young
people the proper habits of showing the respect due to others because of their
family relationship or social role. Again, such formality is not likely to
appeal to modern ideas of social behavior.
What then is the value of the book?
It does try to show some basic Confucian concepts, such as the junzi
ideal, benevolence and reciprocity, in a positive light and encourages people
to develop their inner attitudes as much as their outer image. It uses pithy
stories from Chinese traditions as well as from Buddhism, Christianity and
Indian, Japanese and English literature to illustrate its message. The variety
of these sources indicate that the message tends to be of a universal nature
rather that distinctively Confucian.
Indirectly the book indicates how
much China has
changed and how unlikely it is to retain elements from its past, no matter how
valuable they might be, if they clash with newly emerged values and needs
The Movie
Confucius No Match for Blue Aliens
The above was the headline in a Hong
Kong newspaper after the release of the 2010 block-buster movie,
Confucius.
It refers to the fact that the
government-encouraged film, Confucius, had taken in only four million
euro in its first three days while the Hollywood
sensation Avatar, with its blue skinned aliens, had pulled in eleven
million in its first three days in China.
Shortly afterwards, the authorities cut Avatar=s
run short with the excuse that they wanted more time for locally produced
films. To many looked like an effort by the government to get more people to
watch Confucius by removing alternatives.
Confucius cost 15 million
euro to make and was intended to capture the interest of the younger
generation. As a result it included a number of battle scenes and a romantic
interest in the form of one of the more popular actresses, Zhou Xun. The role
of Confucius was played by the Hong Kong-born, international star Chow Yun-fat.
The movie was intended to be part
of the 2009 celebrations of the 50th anniversary of modern China
and the 2,560 birthday of Confucius but production problems caused it to miss
the deadline.
Most of China=s film stars, as well as famous names
from Hong Kong and Taiwan,
were given minor roles. The movie itself had a highly respected director and a
large budget. Its purpose was to increase interest in the traditional values
that Confucius represented but the
younger generation found it boring and their elders saw it as a betrayal of
history.
Despite the efforts of the film to
portray him as such, Confucius was neither a skillful general nor an astute
politician. Nor is there any evidence that he had any romantic interest such as
the lady acted by Zhou Xun.
While Chow Yun-fat displayed the
patience, courtesy and unassuming aspects that one would expect from Confucius,
he had little to do or say that cast light on the teachings of the sage. The
most authentic aspects were the court setting and the etiquette beloved by
Confucius. It also portrayed his fate as an under-appreciated, exiled scholar
but such a story-line is rarely appreciated by movie goers who just want to be
be entertained.
3. The Institutes
Confucius: Assistant to the Chinese God of Wealth or Tutor
for Chinese Souls?
In June, 2004 the first >Confucius Institute= was given a trial run in Tashkent.
By November, 2009 there were 282 in 88 countries and the Chinese government
says there will be 500 worldwide by 2010 and
1000 by 2020.
The charter of the institutes
explains, AConfucius
is a famous thinker, educator and philosopher in China.
His doctrine has a very important influence throughout the world. To name this
institute after him shows the longevity of the Chinese language and culture. It
also embodies the development trend of the integration of Chinese language and
culture in the new century.@
(cf >The
Confucian Revival=, CR
October, 2006).
The model for the institute was
said to be the international centers of the Goethe Institute, the British
Council and Alliance Francaise which have both cultural and language programs.
While the Confucius version has largely focused on language classes it is
regarded in some countries as a
potential propaganda vehicle.
Others see it as a money making
operation. It draws on mainland universities for teachers, and as they are
always interested in international programs that make money, Asia Times Online stated, AConfucianism has become an assistant to
the Chinese God of Wealth (and a representative of Chinese diplomacy) and not a
tutor for Chinese souls.@
According to the London Confucius
Institute website, Ait is a
non-profit-making organization that aims to promote Chinese language learning
and teaching and the understanding of Chinese culture in the UK.
It also endeavors to facilitate research in these areas as well as cultural and
educational exchange between the UK
and China.@
As look at it list of the courses
it offers show ten language-related course one with the title, >Confucianism and Chinese Society
Today=. The
institute also organizes social activities on traditional festivals and courses
on traditional medicine, Chinese dance and opera, taichi and the tea ceremony.
There is not much to indicate that
the institutes are trying to spread the teaching of Confucius. Rather they seem
to be using the favorable symbol of Confucius to give a positive note to their
cultural and language promotion activities.
4. Other Recent Developments
**Confucian Holiday voted down in Hong Kong
In January 2010, Hong
Kong legislators turned down a proposal to celebrate Confucius= birthday as a pubic holiday.
Lee Cheuk-yan, of the Confederation
of Trade Unions, wondered how the 2,000 yer old teacher could help solve modern
social problems. AOthers
are talking about the post-80s and you are talking about something founded
before Christ,@ he
stated.
One of the pro-Beijing parties had
put forward the proposal, calling on the government to encourage Confucianism
in order to revive moral values and strengthen family ties.
Democratic Party chairman, Albert Ho, was
worried the government would use Confucianism as a political tool. AI don=t
want the combination of politics and religion, or to see Confucianism used to
strengthen the rule of a class.@
Prior to the debate, Taoist,
Islamic, Buddhist and Christian leaders had voiced support for the idea. A
survey showed that 54.3 percent of the public backed the proposal while 59.3
percent agreed that promoting Confucianism could relieve social problems such
as domestic violence and weak moral standards.
The clinching argument was that Hong
Kong has a fixed number of 17 public holidays and no one could agree on which of them to
abolish in order to make way for Confucius Day. In 1999, Hong Kong
made Buddha=s
Birthday a public holiday, replacing the last of the colonial
celebrations.
**Gambling on Confucius?
The Chinese state lottery has
decided to offer Confucius-themed tickets with colorful drawings of the
philosopher and his proverbs. The tickets are aimed at educating the public
about ancient Chinese culture and help people to live a Ahealthy,
wholesome life.@
The program was launched in Qufu,
Confucius=
hometown, at the end of January, 2010.
However, critics on a popular
website complained that gambling was against the spirit of Confucius. At the
same time, the sage might appreciate the traditional practicality by which a
government sponsored education campaign is combined with an unrelated program
to raise funds.
5.The Challenge: A Christian Reflection
In 1595, Matteo Ricci wrote to
Acquaviva, the Jesuit General, about this conviction that Confucius was another
Seneca and that his Four Books Aare
good moral documents.@
In a short time Ricci himself became a noted Confucian scholar and his
Confucius-like self-cultivation and moral integrity were what quicky attracted
a circle of influential friends in a China that had previously rejected all
foreigners as barbarians.
For Christians the goals and
methods of Confucian self-cultivation have a familiar ring. They spell out
practical steps of practicing love of neighbor in everyday life. Those who
participate in life in East Asia soon experience a
warmth, respect and consideration that they have not seen to the same degree even
in the >Christian
West=. Those
interested in locating the source of this sensitivity to others, find it in the
Confucian habit of showing consideration for others. This is what impressed
Ricci and led him to praise Confucian morality or behavior.
Another
element of Confucianism that impresses Christians like Ricci is the attention
given to Heaven as the source of morality and inspiration in life. The early
Jesuit missionaries used the character for heaven in translating their concept
of God and it is still used in countries like China
and Korea.
The beauty of Confucian morality
and it basis on a belief in Heaven could lead some to ask, AWhat has the Christian message got to
add to it? Why not leave Confucians as they are and encourage them?@
However the Jesuits had quickly
noted the limitations of using Heaven on its own as an equivalent for the
Christian God. It is impersonal and remote. They modified it by using terms
like >King
of Heaven= or >Master of Heaven= and began to introduce a God who is
closer and calls the individual.
There is also the danger that, in
time, a system like Confucianism that
emphasizes conformity to outward practices can become mere flattery and show.
Xu Guangqi, an eminent Confucian scholar and official who became a Catholic in
1600, explained the background for his conversion.
ABuddhism
has been in China
for 1800 years, and it is unable to correct the morals and hearts of the people,
it words are specious. Talks about Zen are interpolated with ideas from Laozi
and Zhunagzi=s
doctrines, with no reality or propriety; the practitioners of Yoga use Taoist
talismans with absurdity and no sense, and furthermore they intend to fight
Buddha in the name of the Lord on High. And thus, all of them are contrary to
the doctrines of ancient emperors, sages and virtuous men.
ASo what shall we follow? What shall we
do? It is necessary that men do good to the greatest extent, but then will
the >learning
for serving Heaven=, that
has been transmitted by all the officials, truly assist the sovereign
civilizing influence, influence the Confucian doctrine and rectify the Buddhist
Law? Clearly discern the policy of prosperity and lasting peace, there is
nothing beyond that.@
Xu recognized that the morality of
Confucius had lost its power and that Buddhism and Taoism were unable to revive
it. He turned to Christianity in the
hope that the >Lord
of Heaven= would Asupplement Confucianism and replace Buddhism." Hugh MacMahon 2/10/10
No comments:
Post a Comment